Jaguar F-Pace 2015 vs Lexus RX 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 340 HP | 277 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 346 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.8 seconds | 8 seconds | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar F-Pace engine produces 63 HP more power than Lexus RX, whereas torque is 104 NM more than Lexus RX. Thanks to more power Jaguar F-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 10.6 | |
|
The Jaguar F-Pace is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar F-Pace consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Lexus RX, which means that by driving the Jaguar F-Pace over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Jaguar XJ, Jaguar F-Type, Jaguar XF, Jaguar XE | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota RAV4, Toyota Camry, Toyota Sienna, Lexus ES | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Lexus RX might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Lexus RX engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.73 m | |
| Jaguar F-Pace is 4 cm shorter than the Lexus RX, 19 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar F-Pace is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 508 litres | 446 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
650 litres | 1570 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Jaguar F-Pace has 62 litres more trunk space than the Lexus RX. The Lexus RX may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Lexus RX (by 920 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Pace is 0.5 metres more than that of the Lexus RX, which means Jaguar F-Pace can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 2`545 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Lexus RX scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 200 | 28 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Pace has
|
Lexus RX has
| |