Jaguar F-Pace 2015 vs Volvo XC40 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar F-Pace engine produces 30 HP more power than Volvo XC40, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Volvo XC40. Thanks to more power Jaguar F-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC40 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Jaguar F-Pace consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC40, which means that by driving the Jaguar F-Pace over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jaguar F-Pace consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC40. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jaguar F-Pace 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar F-Pace 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is larger. Jaguar F-Pace is 31 cm longer than the Volvo XC40, 21 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 508 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
650 litres | no data | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace has more luggage capacity. Jaguar F-Pace has 48 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC40. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Pace is 0.9 metres more than that of the Volvo XC40, which means Jaguar F-Pace can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`460 | 2`240 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Volvo XC40 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 000 | 22 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Pace has
|
Volvo XC40 has
| |