Jaguar F-Pace 2015 vs Skoda Kodiaq 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 6.9 seconds | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar F-Pace engine produces 60 HP less power than Skoda Kodiaq, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Skoda Kodiaq. Due to the lower power, Jaguar F-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 6.4 | |
|
The Jaguar F-Pace is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar F-Pace consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Kodiaq, which means that by driving the Jaguar F-Pace over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| Jaguar F-Pace gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 213 mm (8.4 inches) | 197 mm (7.8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jaguar F-Pace can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Jaguar F-Pace 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar F-Pace 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is larger, but slightly lower. Jaguar F-Pace is 3 cm longer than the Skoda Kodiaq, 19 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar F-Pace is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 508 litres | 725 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
650 litres | 1960 litres | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jaguar F-Pace has 217 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Kodiaq. This could mean that the Jaguar F-Pace uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 1310 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Pace is 0.1 metres more than that of the Skoda Kodiaq. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`460 | 2`421 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 24 800 | 19 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Pace has
|
Skoda Kodiaq has
| |