Jaguar F-Pace 2015 vs Porsche Macan 2018
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 180 HP | 252 HP | |
Torque: | 430 NM | 370 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 6.7 seconds | |
Porsche Macan is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar F-Pace engine produces 72 HP less power than Porsche Macan, but torque is 60 NM more than Porsche Macan. Due to the lower power, Jaguar F-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 7.4 | |
The Jaguar F-Pace is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar F-Pace consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Porsche Macan, which means that by driving the Jaguar F-Pace over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
1270 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
Jaguar F-Pace gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Ground clearance: | 213 mm (8.4 inches) | 300 mm (11.8 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Porsche Macan can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 10 years | 11 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Audi A6, Audi A7 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar F-Pace might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Jaguar F-Pace engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Jaguar F-Pace 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar F-Pace 2015 2.0 engine Porsche Macan 2018 2.0 engine: This engine, while more reliable than previous versions of the EA88 series, still has several characteristic issues. The main problems include: Timing chain stretching. The chain typically lasts around ... More about Porsche Macan 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.73 m | 4.69 m | |
Width: | 2.07 m | 1.92 m | |
Height: | 1.65 m | 1.62 m | |
Jaguar F-Pace is larger. Jaguar F-Pace is 5 cm longer than the Porsche Macan, 15 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar F-Pace is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 508 litres | 500 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
650 litres | 1795 litres | |
Jaguar F-Pace has 8 litres more trunk space than the Porsche Macan. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Porsche Macan (by 1145 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Pace is 0.3 metres more than that of the Porsche Macan. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`460 | 2`510 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | high | |
Average price (€): | 28 400 | 63 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Pace has
|
Porsche Macan has
| |