Jaguar F-Pace 2015 vs Nissan X-Trail 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar F-Pace engine produces 50 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Jaguar F-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar F-Pace is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Jaguar F-Pace consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar F-Pace could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jaguar F-Pace consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 213 mm (8.4 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jaguar F-Pace 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar F-Pace 2015 2.0 engine Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is larger, but lower. Jaguar F-Pace is 4 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 25 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar F-Pace is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 508 litres | 135 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 135 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 508 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
650 litres | 1877 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space (by 42 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 1227 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Pace is 1.1 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Jaguar F-Pace can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`460 kg | 2`310 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`845 kg | 1`590 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 615 kg | 720 kg | |
| Jaguar F-Pace load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 17 procentiem less than Nissan X-Trail. Therefore, Nissan X-Trail is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 24 200 | 24 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Pace has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |