Jaguar F-Pace 2015 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar F-Pace engine produces 30 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Thanks to more power Jaguar F-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar F-Pace is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar F-Pace consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that by driving the Jaguar F-Pace over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar F-Pace consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Jaguar F-Pace gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 213 mm (8.4 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jaguar F-Pace can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Outlander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE, Land Rover Discovery Sport | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi L 200, Mitsubishi ASX | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jaguar F-Pace engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is larger, but slightly lower. Jaguar F-Pace is 4 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 27 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar F-Pace is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 508 litres | 128 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
650 litres | 1608 litres | |
| Jaguar F-Pace has 380 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 958 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Pace is 1.7 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Jaguar F-Pace can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`460 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 30 800 | 18 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Pace has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |