Jaguar F-Pace 2015 vs Lexus RX 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 277 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 346 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 8 seconds | |
|
Lexus RX is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar F-Pace engine produces 97 HP less power than Lexus RX, but torque is 84 NM more than Lexus RX. Due to the lower power, Jaguar F-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 10.6 | |
|
The Jaguar F-Pace is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar F-Pace consumes 5.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Lexus RX, which means that by driving the Jaguar F-Pace over 15,000 km in a year you can save 795 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| Jaguar F-Pace gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE, Land Rover Discovery Sport | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota RAV4, Toyota Camry, Toyota Sienna, Lexus ES | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.73 m | |
| Jaguar F-Pace is 4 cm shorter than the Lexus RX, 19 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar F-Pace is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 508 litres | 446 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
650 litres | 1570 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Jaguar F-Pace has 62 litres more trunk space than the Lexus RX. The Lexus RX may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Lexus RX (by 920 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Pace is 0.9 metres more than that of the Lexus RX, which means Jaguar F-Pace can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`460 | 2`545 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Lexus RX scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 30 800 | 27 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Pace has
|
Lexus RX has
| |