Jaguar F-Pace 2015 vs BMW X4 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 8 seconds | |
|
BMW X4 is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar F-Pace engine produces 10 HP less power than BMW X4, but torque is 30 NM more than BMW X4. Due to the lower power, Jaguar F-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar F-Pace is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Jaguar F-Pace consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar F-Pace could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jaguar F-Pace consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1280 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 213 mm (8.4 inches) | 204 mm (8 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3, BMW 2 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Jaguar F-Pace 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar F-Pace 2015 2.0 engine BMW X4 2014 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great resource. Overall, the chains are more reliable than in BMW N-series engines, but also tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine requires good quality fuel, maintenance and ... More about BMW X4 2014 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is larger. Jaguar F-Pace is 6 cm longer than the BMW X4, 19 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar F-Pace is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 508 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
650 litres | 1400 litres | |
| Jaguar F-Pace has 8 litres more trunk space than the BMW X4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X4 (by 750 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Pace is 0.4 metres more than that of the BMW X4, which means Jaguar F-Pace can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`460 | 2`335 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 28 400 | 21 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
BMW X4 has
| |