Jaguar F-Pace 2015 vs BMW X3 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 8 seconds | |
|
BMW X3 is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar F-Pace engine produces 10 HP less power than BMW X3, but torque is 30 NM more than BMW X3. Due to the lower power, Jaguar F-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Jaguar F-Pace consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3, which means that by driving the Jaguar F-Pace over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar F-Pace consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1580 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 213 mm (8.4 inches) | 204 mm (8 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 6 sērija, BMW X4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar F-Pace might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jaguar F-Pace 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar F-Pace 2015 2.0 engine BMW X3 2017 2.0 engine: A fairly reliable engine with a long service life. On the whole, the chains are more reliable than in the BMW N-series engines, but they also have a tendency to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs to be ... More about BMW X3 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is larger, but slightly lower. Jaguar F-Pace is 2 cm longer than the BMW X3, 18 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar F-Pace is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 508 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
650 litres | 1600 litres | |
|
BMW X3 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jaguar F-Pace has 42 litres less trunk space than the BMW X3. This could mean that the Jaguar F-Pace uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X3 (by 950 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Pace is 0.3 metres more than that of the BMW X3. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`460 | 2`420 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Jaguar F-Pace scores higher in safety tests. The Jaguar F-Pace scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 28 400 | 29 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Pace has
|
BMW X3 has
| |