Jaguar F-Pace 2020 vs Mercedes GLA 2019
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jaguar F-Pace is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mercedes GLA can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mercedes GLA also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 5.0 | 1.3 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 550 HP | 116 - 421 HP | |
| Torque: | 365 - 700 NM | 200 - 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4 - 9.9 seconds | 4.3 - 10.8 seconds | |
| In general, Jaguar F-Pace are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Mercedes GLA. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 2.5 - 12.2 | 1.6 - 9.3 | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace petrol engines consumes on average 3.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mercedes GLA. On average, Jaguar F-Pace equipped with diesel engines consume 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes GLA. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 213 mm (8.4 inches) | 143 mm (5.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jaguar F-Pace can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.61 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 793 litres | 435 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1842 litres | 1430 litres | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Mercedes GLA may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jaguar F-Pace (by 412 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Pace is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mercedes GLA, which means Jaguar F-Pace can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`690 kg | ~ 2`125 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`014 kg | ~ 1`527 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 676 kg | ~ 598 kg | |
| Jaguar F-Pace load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem more than Mercedes GLA. Therefore, Jaguar F-Pace is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 31 200 | 34 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Pace has
|
Mercedes GLA has
| |