Jaguar F-Pace 2015 vs Volvo XC60 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jaguar F-Pace is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo XC60 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jaguar F-Pace also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 5.0 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 500 HP | 136 - 306 HP | |
| Torque: | 365 - 700 NM | 320 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.3 - 10.2 seconds | 6.9 - 11.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 11.9 | 5.3 - 10.7 | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC60. On average, Jaguar F-Pace equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 213 mm (8.4 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is larger, but lower. Jaguar F-Pace is 9 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 18 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar F-Pace is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 650 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
650 litres | 1455 litres | |
| Jaguar F-Pace has 155 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC60 (by 805 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Pace is 0.6 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Jaguar F-Pace can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`464 | ~ 2`401 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 28 400 | 15 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Pace has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |