Jaguar E-Pace 2020 vs Mazda CX-30 2019
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.5 Hybrid | 1.8 Diesel | |
| Hybrid engines (Jaguar E-Pace) excel in urban environments with superior fuel efficiency and lower emissions during stop-and-go driving. Diesel engines (Mazda CX-30), however, are more fuel-efficient on long highway trips and provide greater torque for towing and heavy loads. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar E-Pace engine produces 84 HP more power than Mazda CX-30, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Mazda CX-30. Thanks to more power Jaguar E-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 6.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 5.0 l/100km | ||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 51 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 212 mm (8.3 inches) | 175 mm (6.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jaguar E-Pace can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.56 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 601 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1386 litres | 1406 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Mazda CX-30 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-30 (by 20 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar E-Pace is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-30, which means Jaguar E-Pace can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`670 kg | 1`969 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`098 kg | 1`371 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 572 kg | 598 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 28 600 | 21 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar E-Pace has
|
Mazda CX-30 has
| |