Jaguar E-Pace 2020 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar E-Pace engine produces 77 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 120 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Due to the lower power, Jaguar E-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 6.2 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar E-Pace consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar E-Pace could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 212 mm (8.3 inches) | 212 mm (8.3 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jaguar E-Pace engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Jaguar F-Pace | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Land Rover Defender, Jaguar XF, Jaguar E-Pace | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 601 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1386 litres | 1383 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 28 000 | 26 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar E-Pace has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |