Jaguar E-Pace 2020 vs Mazda CX-30 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar E-Pace engine produces 47 HP more power than Mazda CX-30, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Mazda CX-30. Thanks to more power Jaguar E-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.0 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 51 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 212 mm (8.3 inches) | 175 mm (6.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jaguar E-Pace can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.56 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 601 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1386 litres | 1406 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Jaguar E-Pace has 171 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-30. The Mazda CX-30 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-30 (by 20 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar E-Pace is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-30. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`969 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 31 200 | 22 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar E-Pace has
|
Mazda CX-30 has
| |