Jaguar E-Pace 2020 vs Mercedes GLA 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 7.4 seconds | |
| Jaguar E-Pace engine produces 14 HP more power than Mercedes GLA, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Mercedes GLA. Despite the higher power, Jaguar E-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 4.9 | |
|
The Mercedes GLA is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar E-Pace consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes GLA, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar E-Pace could require 315 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| Jaguar E-Pace gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 212 mm (8.3 inches) | 143 mm (5.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jaguar E-Pace can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 320'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Jaguar F-Pace | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Mercedes E klase, Mercedes A klase, Mercedes B klase, Mercedes CLA | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes GLA might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.61 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 601 litres | 425 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1386 litres | 1420 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Mercedes GLA may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes GLA (by 34 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`135 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 28 000 | 34 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar E-Pace has
|
Mercedes GLA has
| |