Jaguar E-Pace 2020 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar E-Pace engine produces 54 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Thanks to more power Jaguar E-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.6 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 65 litres | |
| 910 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 320'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Jaguar F-Pace | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Jaguar XE | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 601 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1386 litres | no data | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Jaguar E-Pace has 10 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`490 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 26 400 | 34 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar E-Pace has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |