Jaguar E-Pace 2020 vs Skoda Karoq 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Jaguar E-Pace engine produces 150 HP more power than Skoda Karoq, whereas torque is 150 NM more than Skoda Karoq. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine: The engine is praised for being both flexible and torquey, delivering impressive performance for its horsepower rating. It is also remarkably fuel-efficient. However, the engine is very demanding when it comes ... More about Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.61 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 601 litres | 521 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1386 litres | no data | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jaguar E-Pace has 80 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. The Skoda Karoq may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 26 400 | 23 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar E-Pace has
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |