Jaguar E-Pace 2018 vs BMW X1 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
|
BMW X1 is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar E-Pace engine produces 40 HP less power than BMW X1, whereas torque is 20 NM less than BMW X1. Due to the lower power, Jaguar E-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 51 litres | |
| 770 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 204 mm (8 inches) | 183 mm (7.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jaguar E-Pace can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Jaguar E-Pace version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from eight 4x4 versions of Jaguar E-Pace 2018 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE | Used also on BMW 2 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar E-Pace might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jaguar E-Pace 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar E-Pace 2018 2.0 engine BMW X1 2016 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ... More about BMW X1 2016 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.60 m | |
| Jaguar E-Pace is 4 cm shorter than the BMW X1, 16 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar E-Pace is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1234 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2577 litres | 1550 litres | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jaguar E-Pace has 729 litres more trunk space than the BMW X1. The BMW X1 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jaguar E-Pace (by 1027 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar E-Pace is 0.1 metres more than that of the BMW X1. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`320 | 2`055 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The BMW X1 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 22 400 | 16 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar E-Pace has
|
BMW X1 has
| |