Jaguar E-Pace 2018 vs BMW X1 2018

 
Jaguar E-Pace
2018 - 2020
BMW X1
2018 - 2019
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 150 HP150 HP
Torque: 380 NM350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.7 seconds9.3 seconds
Jaguar E-Pace and BMW X1 have the same engine power, but Jaguar E-Pace torque is 30 NM more than BMW X1. Jaguar E-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.25.0
Real fuel consumption: 7.1 l/100km5.7 l/100km
The BMW X1 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Jaguar E-Pace consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar E-Pace could require 30 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar E-Pace consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1050 km in combined cycle1010 km in combined cycle
1140 km on highway1130 km on highway
770 km with real consumption890 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)
Ground clearance: 204 mm (8 inches)183 mm (7.2 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Jaguar E-Pace can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km330'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 10 years11 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XEInstalled on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 1 sērija, BMW 2 sērija, BMW X2
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar E-Pace might be a better choice in this respect.
Jaguar E-Pace 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ...  More about Jaguar E-Pace 2018 2.0 engine 

BMW X1 2018 2.0 engine: A fairly reliable engine with a long service life. On the whole, the chains are more reliable than in the BMW N-series engines, but they also have a tendency to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs to be ...  More about BMW X1 2018 2.0 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.40 m4.44 m
Width: 1.98 m1.82 m
Height: 1.65 m1.60 m
Jaguar E-Pace is 4 cm shorter than the BMW X1, 16 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar E-Pace is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 1234 litres505 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2577 litres1550 litres
Jaguar E-Pace has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Jaguar E-Pace has 729 litres more trunk space than the BMW X1. The BMW X1 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jaguar E-Pace (by 1027 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.5 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Jaguar E-Pace is 0.1 metres more than that of the BMW X1.
Gross weight (kg): 2`4002`170
Safety:
The BMW X1 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 22 40017 000
Pros and Cons: Jaguar E-Pace has
  • higher ground clearance
  • roomier boot
BMW X1 has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better safety assist technologies
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv