Jaguar E-Pace 2017 vs Land Rover Freelander 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar E-Pace engine produces 60 HP more power than Land Rover Freelander, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Land Rover Freelander. Thanks to more power Jaguar E-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 9.6 | |
|
The Jaguar E-Pace is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar E-Pace consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that by driving the Jaguar E-Pace over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| Jaguar E-Pace gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jaguar E-Pace engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar F-Type, Jaguar XF, Jaguar XE | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Land Rover Discovery Sport, Jaguar XJ, Jaguar XF | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Freelander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jaguar E-Pace engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.74 m | |
| Jaguar E-Pace is 11 cm shorter than the Land Rover Freelander, 7 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar E-Pace is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1234 litres | 405 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2577 litres | no data | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jaguar E-Pace has 829 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Freelander. The Land Rover Freelander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.46 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar E-Pace is 0.16 metres more than that of the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`400 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 800 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar E-Pace has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |