Jaguar E-Pace 2017 vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 seconds | 6.3 seconds | |
| Jaguar E-Pace engine produces 70 HP more power than Volkswagen Tiguan, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Volkswagen Tiguan. Despite the higher power, Jaguar E-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 7.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.9 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Tiguan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar E-Pace consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar E-Pace could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar E-Pace consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Jaguar E-Pace gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 204 mm (8 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.67 m | |
| Jaguar E-Pace is 10 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Tiguan, 15 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar E-Pace is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1234 litres | 615 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2577 litres | 1655 litres | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Volkswagen Tiguan may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jaguar E-Pace (by 922 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.46 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar E-Pace is 0.039999999999999 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Tiguan. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`400 kg | 2`280 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`894 kg | 1`635 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 506 kg | 645 kg | |
| Jaguar E-Pace load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 27 procentiem less than Volkswagen Tiguan. Therefore, Volkswagen Tiguan is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| The Jaguar E-Pace scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 15 600 | 15 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar E-Pace has
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has
| |