Jaguar E-Pace 2017 vs Skoda Karoq 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar E-Pace engine produces 150 HP more power than Skoda Karoq, whereas torque is 150 NM more than Skoda Karoq. Thanks to more power Jaguar E-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.9 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Karoq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar E-Pace consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar E-Pace could require 375 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar E-Pace consumes 3.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Karoq gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 204 mm (8 inches) | 176 mm (6.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jaguar E-Pace can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar F-Type, Jaguar XF, Jaguar XE | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Skoda Superb, Skoda Scala, Audi A1, Audi Q3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Karoq might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine: The engine is praised for being both flexible and torquey, delivering impressive performance for its horsepower rating. It is also remarkably fuel-efficient. However, the engine is very demanding when it comes ... More about Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace is larger. Jaguar E-Pace is 1 cm longer than the Skoda Karoq, 14 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar E-Pace is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1234 litres | 521 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2577 litres | 1630 litres | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace has more luggage capacity. Jaguar E-Pace has 713 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jaguar E-Pace (by 947 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.46 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar E-Pace is 0.56 metres more than that of the Skoda Karoq, which means Jaguar E-Pace can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`400 | 1`929 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Jaguar E-Pace is better rated in child safety tests. The Jaguar E-Pace scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 600 | 18 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar E-Pace has
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |