Jaguar E-Pace 2017 vs Skoda Karoq 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Jaguar E-Pace engine produces 150 HP more power than Skoda Karoq, whereas torque is 150 NM more than Skoda Karoq. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | no data | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar F-Type, Jaguar XF, Jaguar XE | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Skoda Superb, Skoda Scala, Audi A1, Audi Q3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Karoq might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine: The engine is praised for being both flexible and torquey, delivering impressive performance for its horsepower rating. It is also remarkably fuel-efficient. However, the engine is very demanding when it comes ... More about Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace is larger. Jaguar E-Pace is 1 cm longer than the Skoda Karoq, 14 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar E-Pace is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1234 litres | 521 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2577 litres | no data | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace has more luggage capacity. Jaguar E-Pace has 713 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.46 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`400 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Jaguar E-Pace is better rated in child safety tests. The Jaguar E-Pace scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 400 | 23 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar E-Pace has
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |