Jaguar E-Pace 2017 vs Nissan Qashqai 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar E-Pace engine produces 185 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 235 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Thanks to more power Jaguar E-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 6.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.9 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar E-Pace consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar E-Pace could require 360 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar E-Pace consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 204 mm (8 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jaguar E-Pace can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jaguar E-Pace engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar F-Type, Jaguar XF, Jaguar XE | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Juke, Nissan Pulsar | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar E-Pace might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jaguar E-Pace engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace is larger. Jaguar E-Pace and Nissan Qashqai are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1234 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2577 litres | 1585 litres | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace has more luggage capacity. Jaguar E-Pace has 804 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jaguar E-Pace (by 992 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.46 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar E-Pace is 0.76 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai, which means Jaguar E-Pace can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`400 | 1`880 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 24 800 | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar E-Pace has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |