Jaguar E-Pace 2017 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar E-Pace engine produces 183 HP more power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 246 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. Thanks to more power Jaguar E-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.9 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar E-Pace consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar E-Pace could require 285 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar E-Pace consumes 3.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 204 mm (8 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jaguar E-Pace can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar F-Type, Jaguar XF, Jaguar XE | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jaguar E-Pace engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace is larger. Jaguar E-Pace is 3 cm longer than the Mitsubishi ASX, 17 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1234 litres | 384 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2577 litres | 1206 litres | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace has more luggage capacity. Jaguar E-Pace has 850 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jaguar E-Pace (by 1371 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.46 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar E-Pace is 0.86 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX, which means Jaguar E-Pace can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`400 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 16 800 | 14 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar E-Pace has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |