Jaguar E-Pace 2017 vs Audi Q5 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 370 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 seconds | 6.3 seconds | |
| Jaguar E-Pace engine produces 51 HP more power than Audi Q5, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Audi Q5. Despite the higher power, Jaguar E-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.9 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Audi Q5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar E-Pace consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar E-Pace could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar E-Pace consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi Q5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar F-Type, Jaguar XF, Jaguar XE | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Audi A4, Audi A6, Audi Q7, Volkswagen Touareg | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi Q5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.66 m | |
| Jaguar E-Pace is 27 cm shorter than the Audi Q5, 9 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar E-Pace is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1234 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2577 litres | 1510 litres | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jaguar E-Pace has 684 litres more trunk space than the Audi Q5. The Audi Q5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jaguar E-Pace (by 1067 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.46 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar E-Pace is 0.24 metres less than that of the Audi Q5. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`400 | 2`400 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Jaguar E-Pace scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 24 800 | 29 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar E-Pace has
|
Audi Q5 has
| |