Jaguar E-Pace 2017 vs Mercedes GLC 2015
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 249 HP | 211 HP | |
Torque: | 365 NM | 350 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
Jaguar E-Pace is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar E-Pace engine produces 38 HP more power than Mercedes GLC, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Mercedes GLC. Thanks to more power Jaguar E-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 10.7 l/100km | 9.8 l/100km | |
The Mercedes GLC is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar E-Pace consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes GLC, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar E-Pace could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar E-Pace consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes GLC. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 66 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
1030 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
630 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Ground clearance: | 204 mm (8 inches) | 123 mm (4.8 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Jaguar E-Pace can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 7 years | 8 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar F-Type, Jaguar XF, Jaguar XE | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes A klase, Mercedes B klase | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes GLC might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.40 m | 4.66 m | |
Width: | 1.98 m | 1.89 m | |
Height: | 1.65 m | 1.64 m | |
Jaguar E-Pace is 26 cm shorter than the Mercedes GLC, 9 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar E-Pace is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 1234 litres | 550 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2577 litres | 1600 litres | |
Jaguar E-Pace has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jaguar E-Pace has 684 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes GLC. The Mercedes GLC may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jaguar E-Pace (by 977 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.46 meters | 11.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Jaguar E-Pace is 0.34 metres less than that of the Mercedes GLC. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`400 | 2`400 | |
Safety: | |||
Mercedes GLC scores higher in safety tests. | |||
Quality: | no data | high | |
Average price (€): | 24 800 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar E-Pace has
|
Mercedes GLC has
| |