Jaguar E-Pace 2017 vs Mazda CX-30 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 365 NM | 224 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar E-Pace engine produces 69 HP more power than Mazda CX-30, whereas torque is 141 NM more than Mazda CX-30. Thanks to more power Jaguar E-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 5.6 | |
|
The Mazda CX-30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar E-Pace consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-30, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar E-Pace could require 315 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 48 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 204 mm (8 inches) | 175 mm (6.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jaguar E-Pace can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar F-Type, Jaguar XF, Jaguar XE | Used also on Mazda 3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar E-Pace might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.56 m | |
| Jaguar E-Pace and Mazda CX-30 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1234 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2577 litres | 1406 litres | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace has more luggage capacity. Jaguar E-Pace has 804 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-30. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jaguar E-Pace (by 1171 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.46 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar E-Pace is 0.06 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-30. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`400 | 2`070 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 400 | 23 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar E-Pace has
|
Mazda CX-30 has
| |