Jaguar E-Pace 2017 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar E-Pace engine produces 90 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 120 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Thanks to more power Jaguar E-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Jaguar E-Pace consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar E-Pace could require 165 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jaguar E-Pace consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Land Rover Defender, Jaguar XF, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Jaguar XE | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.66 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jaguar E-Pace is 2 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, width is practically the same , while the height of Jaguar E-Pace is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1234 litres | 575 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2577 litres | no data | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace has more luggage capacity. Jaguar E-Pace has 659 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.46 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar E-Pace is 0.16 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`420 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 400 | 22 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar E-Pace has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |