Jaguar E-Pace 2017 vs Jaguar F-Pace 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar E-Pace engine produces 60 HP more power than Jaguar F-Pace, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Jaguar F-Pace. Thanks to more power Jaguar E-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Jaguar E-Pace consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar F-Pace, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar E-Pace could require 135 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jaguar E-Pace consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar F-Pace. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Jaguar F-Pace gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 204 mm (8 inches) | 213 mm (8.4 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jaguar F-Pace engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Land Rover Defender, Jaguar XF, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE, Land Rover Discovery Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar F-Pace might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace is smaller. Jaguar E-Pace is 34 cm shorter than the Jaguar F-Pace, 9 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1234 litres | 508 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2577 litres | 650 litres | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jaguar E-Pace has 726 litres more trunk space than the Jaguar F-Pace. The Jaguar F-Pace may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jaguar E-Pace (by 1927 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.46 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar E-Pace is 0.84 metres less than that of the Jaguar F-Pace, which means Jaguar E-Pace can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`420 | 2`460 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 24 600 | 30 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar E-Pace has
|
Jaguar F-Pace has
| |