Jaguar E-Pace 2017 vs BMW X1 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar E-Pace engine produces 90 HP more power than BMW X1, whereas torque is 150 NM more than BMW X1. Thanks to more power Jaguar E-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X1 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar E-Pace consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar E-Pace could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar E-Pace consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 1060 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X1 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 204 mm (8 inches) | 183 mm (7.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jaguar E-Pace can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Land Rover Defender, Jaguar XF, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 1 sērija, BMW 2 sērija, BMW X2 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| BMW X1 2018 2.0 engine: A fairly reliable engine with a long service life. On the whole, the chains are more reliable than in the BMW N-series engines, but they also have a tendency to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs to be ... More about BMW X1 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.60 m | |
| Jaguar E-Pace is 4 cm shorter than the BMW X1, 16 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar E-Pace is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1234 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2577 litres | 1550 litres | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jaguar E-Pace has 729 litres more trunk space than the BMW X1. The BMW X1 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jaguar E-Pace (by 1027 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.46 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar E-Pace is 0.06 metres more than that of the BMW X1. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`420 | 2`190 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The BMW X1 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 22 400 | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar E-Pace has
|
BMW X1 has
| |