Jaguar E-Pace 2017 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar E-Pace engine produces 30 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Thanks to more power Jaguar E-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| 780 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar E-Pace might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jaguar E-Pace 2017 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar E-Pace 2017 2.0 engine Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace is larger. Jaguar E-Pace is 4 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 9 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar E-Pace is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1234 litres | 575 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2577 litres | no data | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace has more luggage capacity. Jaguar E-Pace has 659 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.46 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar E-Pace is 0.16 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`400 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 400 | 22 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar E-Pace has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |