Jaguar E-Pace 2017 vs Kia XCeed 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar E-Pace engine produces 44 HP more power than Kia XCeed, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Kia XCeed. Thanks to more power Jaguar E-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 4.4 | |
|
The Kia XCeed is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar E-Pace consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia XCeed, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar E-Pace could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| Kia XCeed gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai i30, Kia Optima | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar E-Pace might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jaguar E-Pace 2017 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar E-Pace 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.48 m | |
| Jaguar E-Pace and Kia XCeed are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1234 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2577 litres | 1332 litres | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace has more luggage capacity. Jaguar E-Pace has 854 litres more trunk space than the Kia XCeed. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jaguar E-Pace (by 1245 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.46 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar E-Pace is 0.86 metres more than that of the Kia XCeed, which means Jaguar E-Pace can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`400 | 1`950 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 400 | 21 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar E-Pace has
|
Kia XCeed has
| |