Jaguar E-Pace 2017 vs Audi Q5 2016
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 180 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 430 NM | 340 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Jaguar E-Pace engine produces 30 HP more power than Audi Q5, whereas torque is 90 NM more than Audi Q5. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | no data | |
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Jaguar E-Pace 2017 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar E-Pace 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.40 m | 4.66 m | |
Width: | 1.98 m | 1.89 m | |
Height: | 1.65 m | 1.66 m | |
Jaguar E-Pace is 27 cm shorter than the Audi Q5, 9 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar E-Pace is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 1234 litres | 550 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2577 litres | no data | |
Jaguar E-Pace has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jaguar E-Pace has 684 litres more trunk space than the Audi Q5. The Audi Q5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.46 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`400 | no data | |
Safety: | |||
The Jaguar E-Pace scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | no data | high | |
Average price (€): | 22 400 | 26 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar E-Pace has
|
| |