Jaguar E-Pace 2017 vs Land Rover Freelander 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Jaguar E-Pace and Land Rover Freelander have the same engine power, but Jaguar E-Pace torque is 40 NM less than Land Rover Freelander. Jaguar E-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar E-Pace is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar E-Pace consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that by driving the Jaguar E-Pace over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar E-Pace consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Freelander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar E-Pace might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jaguar E-Pace 2017 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar E-Pace 2017 2.0 engine Land Rover Freelander 2012 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Freelander 2012 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.74 m | |
| Jaguar E-Pace is 11 cm shorter than the Land Rover Freelander, 7 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar E-Pace is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1234 litres | 405 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2577 litres | no data | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jaguar E-Pace has 829 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Freelander. The Land Rover Freelander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.46 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar E-Pace is 0.16 metres more than that of the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`400 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 800 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar E-Pace has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |