Jaguar E-Pace 2017 vs Nissan Qashqai 2017
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 130 HP | |
Torque: | 380 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
Jaguar E-Pace is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar E-Pace engine produces 20 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Thanks to more power Jaguar E-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 4.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar E-Pace consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar E-Pace could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar E-Pace consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
1070 km on highway | 1240 km on highway | ||
770 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Ground clearance: | 204 mm (8 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Jaguar E-Pace can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 10 years | 14 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Qashqai might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Jaguar E-Pace 2017 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar E-Pace 2017 2.0 engine Nissan Qashqai 2017 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Nissan Qashqai 2017 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.40 m | 4.39 m | |
Width: | 1.98 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.65 m | 1.59 m | |
Jaguar E-Pace is larger. Jaguar E-Pace and Nissan Qashqai are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 1234 litres | 430 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2577 litres | 1585 litres | |
Jaguar E-Pace has more luggage capacity. Jaguar E-Pace has 804 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jaguar E-Pace (by 992 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.46 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Jaguar E-Pace is 0.76 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai, which means Jaguar E-Pace can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`400 | 2`005 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 20 600 | 14 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar E-Pace has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |