Jaguar E-Pace 2020 vs Mazda CX-30 2019
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 1.8 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 - 300 HP | 116 - 189 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 - 430 NM | 213 - 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 - 10.3 seconds | 8.3 - 12.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 4.4 - 6.4 | |
| Ground clearance: | 212 mm (8.3 inches) | 175 - 180 mm (6.9 - 7.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jaguar E-Pace can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.56 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 601 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1386 litres | 1406 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Jaguar E-Pace has 171 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-30. The Mazda CX-30 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-30 (by 20 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar E-Pace is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-30, which means Jaguar E-Pace can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`670 | ~ 1`986 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 26 400 | 23 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar E-Pace has
|
Mazda CX-30 has
| |