Jaguar E-Pace 2017 vs Land Rover Freelander 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 300 HP | 150 - 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 - 500 NM | 340 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 - 10.7 seconds | 8.8 - 11.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 8.2 | 6.0 - 9.6 | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Land Rover Freelander. On average, Jaguar E-Pace equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.74 m | |
| Jaguar E-Pace is 11 cm shorter than the Land Rover Freelander, 7 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar E-Pace is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1234 litres | 405 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2577 litres | no data | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Land Rover Freelander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar E-Pace is 0.2 metres more than that of the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`393 kg | ~ 2`505 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`837 kg | ~ 1`776 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 556 kg | ~ 729 kg | |
| Jaguar E-Pace load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 31 procentiem less than Land Rover Freelander. Therefore, Land Rover Freelander is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 000 | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar E-Pace has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |