Jaguar E-Pace 2017 vs Mercedes GLC 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jaguar E-Pace is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Mercedes GLC is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jaguar E-Pace is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mercedes GLC can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jaguar E-Pace also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 - 4.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 300 HP | 170 - 510 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 - 500 NM | 350 - 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 - 10.7 seconds | 3.8 - 8.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 8.2 | 5.5 - 10.7 | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes GLC. On average, Jaguar E-Pace equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes GLC. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 204 mm (8 inches) | 123 mm (4.8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jaguar E-Pace can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.65 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.64 m | |
| Jaguar E-Pace is 25 cm shorter than the Mercedes GLC, 10 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar E-Pace is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1234 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2577 litres | 1600 litres | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jaguar E-Pace has 684 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes GLC. The Mercedes GLC may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jaguar E-Pace (by 977 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar E-Pace is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mercedes GLC, which means Jaguar E-Pace can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`393 | ~ 2`503 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mercedes GLC scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 24 600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar E-Pace has
|
Mercedes GLC has
| |