Isuzu Trooper 2000 vs Volvo XC90 2002
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 159 HP | 163 HP | |
Torque: | 333 NM | 340 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.5 seconds | 12 seconds | |
Volvo XC90 is a more dynamic driving. Isuzu Trooper engine produces 4 HP less power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 7 NM less than Volvo XC90. Due to the lower power, Isuzu Trooper reaches 100 km/h speed 4.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 9.1 | |
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Isuzu Trooper consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Isuzu Trooper could require 315 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
970 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 560'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo XC90 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 6 years | 5 years | |
Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo XC70, Volvo C30 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo XC90 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Volvo XC90 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Volvo XC90 2002 2.4 engine: These diesel engines are frequently affected by intake manifold swirl flap seizures. This issue often leads to airflow disruptions and rough engine operation.
The actuator for the turbocharger, which relies ... More about Volvo XC90 2002 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.80 m | 4.80 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.90 m | |
Height: | 1.84 m | 1.74 m | |
Isuzu Trooper is smaller, but higher. Isuzu Trooper and Volvo XC90 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 1190 litres | 249 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2746 litres | 2404 litres | |
Isuzu Trooper has more luggage capacity. Isuzu Trooper has 941 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC90. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Isuzu Trooper (by 342 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 12.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Isuzu Trooper is 2.8 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Isuzu Trooper can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`810 | 2`735 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | low | |
Average price (€): | 6000 | 3800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Isuzu Trooper has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |