Isuzu Rodeo 1995 vs Jeep Cherokee 1993
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.6 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 204 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 13 seconds | |
| Isuzu Rodeo engine produces 2 HP less power than Jeep Cherokee, but torque is 4 NM more than Jeep Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.0 | 12.7 | |
|
The Isuzu Rodeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Isuzu Rodeo consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that by driving the Isuzu Rodeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 83 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| Isuzu Rodeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Cherokee engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Jeep Wrangler | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.62 m | |
| Isuzu Rodeo is 24 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Isuzu Rodeo is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`066 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Isuzu Rodeo has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |