Isuzu Rodeo 1995 vs Toyota 4-Runner 1989
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.6 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 204 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 18.4 seconds | |
| Isuzu Rodeo engine produces 6 HP more power than Toyota 4-Runner, whereas torque is 12 NM more than Toyota 4-Runner. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.0 | 13.8 | |
|
The Isuzu Rodeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Isuzu Rodeo consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota 4-Runner, which means that by driving the Isuzu Rodeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 83 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 470 km in combined cycle | |
| Isuzu Rodeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | 4x4 - Part time 4WD | |
|
Toyota 4-Runner 1989: Only two wheels (one axis) are powered permanently. All wheel drive is switched on manually and can be used only on soft terrains (cannot be used on pavement). Does not have a center differential. The transfer case can have two modes, which makes it possible to use the low speed range in tough conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 580'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota 4-Runner engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 15 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota 4-Runner might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.75 m | |
| Isuzu Rodeo is 1 cm shorter than the Toyota 4-Runner, width is practically the same , while the height of Isuzu Rodeo is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1200 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2100 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`066 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Isuzu Rodeo has
|
Toyota 4-Runner has
| |