Isuzu Rodeo 1989 vs Jeep Cherokee 1984
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Isuzu Rodeo is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jeep Cherokee can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Isuzu Rodeo also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
Engines: | 2.6 - 3.2 (petrol) | 2.1 - 4.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 120 - 177 HP | 87 - 185 HP | |
Torque: | 204 - 260 NM | 184 - 296 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.5 - 22.3 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.0 - 13.2 | 9.1 - 14.2 | |
Isuzu Rodeo petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jeep Cherokee. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.48 m | 4.24 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.66 m | 1.62 m | |
Isuzu Rodeo is 24 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Isuzu Rodeo is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`148 | ~ 2`771 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 4400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Isuzu Rodeo has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |