Isuzu Rodeo 1989 vs Honda CR-V 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Isuzu Rodeo is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Honda CR-V can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Isuzu Rodeo also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.6 - 3.2 | 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 - 177 HP | 128 - 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 204 - 260 NM | 182 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.5 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.0 - 13.2 | 9.7 - 10.2 | |
|
Isuzu Rodeo petrol engines consumes on average 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Isuzu Rodeo is smaller. Isuzu Rodeo is 5 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Isuzu Rodeo is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 670 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`148 | ~ 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Isuzu Rodeo has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |