Isuzu Rodeo 1989 vs Nissan Pathfinder 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Isuzu Rodeo is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Nissan Pathfinder can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Isuzu Rodeo also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.6 - 3.2 (petrol) | 2.5 - 4.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 - 177 HP | 174 - 269 HP | |
| Torque: | 204 - 260 NM | 385 - 403 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.9 - 12.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.0 - 13.2 | 9.0 - 13.5 | |
|
Isuzu Rodeo petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan Pathfinder. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Isuzu Rodeo is smaller. Isuzu Rodeo is 26 cm shorter than the Nissan Pathfinder, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Isuzu Rodeo is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 515 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2091 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`148 | ~ 2`822 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Isuzu Rodeo has
|
Nissan Pathfinder has
| |