Isuzu D-Max 2008 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 14.6 seconds | |
| Isuzu D-Max and Mitsubishi L 200 have the same engine power, but Isuzu D-Max torque is 34 NM less than Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 8.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
The Isuzu D-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Isuzu D-Max consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200, which means that by driving the Isuzu D-Max over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Isuzu D-Max consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Isuzu D-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.03 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.78 m | |
| Isuzu D-Max is 5 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi L 200, width is practically the same , while the height of Isuzu D-Max is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`650 | 2`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Isuzu D-Max has
|
| |