Isuzu D-Max 2008 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 333 NM | 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 14.6 seconds | |
| Isuzu D-Max engine produces 27 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 19 NM more than Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 8.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Isuzu D-Max consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200, which means that by driving the Isuzu D-Max over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Isuzu D-Max consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 700'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Isuzu D-Max engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 30 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi L 200 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.04 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.78 m | |
| Isuzu D-Max is 4 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi L 200, width is practically the same , while the height of Isuzu D-Max is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Isuzu D-Max has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |