Isuzu D-Max 2020 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2018
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.9 - 3.0 | 2.3 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 190 HP | 150 - 181 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 - 450 NM | 380 - 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 7.6 - 8.6 | |
|
On average, Isuzu D-Max equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.27 m | 5.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.79 m | 1.79 m | |
| Isuzu D-Max and Mitsubishi L 200 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1061 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Isuzu D-Max is 1.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi L 200, which means Isuzu D-Max can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`080 | ~ 2`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 30 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |