Isuzu D-Max 2020 vs Mazda BT-50 2020
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.9 - 3.0 | 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 190 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 - 450 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 7.7 - 8.0 | |
|
On average, Isuzu D-Max equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda BT-50. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.27 m | 5.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.79 m | 1.79 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Isuzu D-Max is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda BT-50, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Isuzu D-Max is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mazda BT-50, which means Isuzu D-Max can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`080 | ~ 3`067 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |