Infiniti QX56 2010 vs Chevrolet Traverse 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Infiniti QX56 is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Chevrolet Traverse can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Chevrolet Traverse also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
Engines: | 5.6 | 3.6 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 405 HP | 281 - 288 HP | |
Torque: | n/a NM | 361 - 366 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.5 | 9.8 - 10.2 | |
Infiniti QX56 petrol engines consumes on average 4.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Traverse. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.26 m | 5.21 m | |
Width: | 2.02 m | no data | |
Height: | 2.00 m | 1.85 m | |
Trunk capacity: | 546 litres | 691 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 3296 litres | |
Chevrolet Traverse has more luggage space. Infiniti QX56 has 145 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Traverse. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`930 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 19 000 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Chevrolet Traverse has
| |