Infiniti Q50 2017 vs Kia Optima 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 211 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 196 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Infiniti Q50 is more dynamic to drive. Infiniti Q50 engine produces 61 HP more power than Kia Optima, whereas torque is 154 NM more than Kia Optima. Thanks to more power Infiniti Q50 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 7.8 | |
|
The Infiniti Q50 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Infiniti Q50 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Optima, which means that by driving the Infiniti Q50 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1400 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| Infiniti Q50 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Kia Optima) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Infiniti Q50) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Infiniti Q50 is smaller. Infiniti Q50 is 5 cm shorter than the Kia Optima, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Infiniti Q50 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 510 litres | |
| Infiniti Q50 has 10 litres less trunk space than the Kia Optima. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Infiniti Q50 is 1.3 metres more than that of the Kia Optima, which means Infiniti Q50 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`020 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 15 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Infiniti Q50 has
|
Kia Optima has
| |